The ‘Stalker’ Set-Up
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way. – Franklin D. Roosevelt
On Tuesday 5th of September I had a call from the reception at Parliament House that a Mr Khalesirad would like to see me. Prior to Tuesday 5th of September I had never met Mr Khalesirad.
• When I woke on Tuesday 5th of September I had no knowledge that Mr Khalesirad intended to visit Parliament.
• There never has been an appointment in my diary to meet with Mr Khalesirad.
• Parliamentary Security freely admitted Mr Khalesirad into the public gallery without question, prior to his being signed in to the annex by me, over two hours later.
• I must say that of all the guests I have had to Parliament house have been more well behaved than Mr Khalsirad. I found his behaviour to be exemplary.
• In relation to leaving Mr Ward and Mr Khalesirad unaccompanied in my closed office, for approx. 45 seconds, I am guilty as charged. However having Mr Ward in my office allows me to get back in when I return. I have been alone in my office without Mr Ward or Jenny, causing me to miss a vote on one occasion.
Parliamentary Security freely admitted Mr Khalesirad into the public gallery without question, prior to his being signed in to the annex by me, over two hours later. Like myself, security were not on notice to refuse admission.
At no time during the meeting on 5th September was I approached about the Member for Keppel’s concerns. At no time on 5th September was Mr Khalesirad asked to leave the Parliamentary Precinct. Rather than contacting me with concerns regarding Mr Khalesirad’s presence (enabling a quick response) there was a letter written to The Speaker and contact made with the media. The first person to contact me in person to discuss this matter was Anthony Templeton from the Courier Mail, who (unlike myself) had been well briefed on the Khalesirad/Lauga allegations.
The politics of all this was played out (very publicly) with myself the clear loser.
The ALP wrote to the speaker saying I let Khasilerad in to intimidate the member for Keppel.
Member for Cairns Rob Pyne has accused the Palaszczuk Government for a ‘set up’ to avoid exposing one of their members to further scrutiny. This follows front page condemnation of Pyne for allowing a “Stalker” into Parliament house recently.
It is easy to ‘name call’ and Mr. Khalesirad has been called many by the ALP including:
• A ‘stalker’ by the member for Keppel and her ALP Parliamentary colleagues.
• A ‘dirty little grub’ by former ALP Minister Rob Schwarten
Let’s examine what the truth is here. The truth is:
• Mr. Khalesirad raised serious concerns regarding Hutchinson and Mr. and Mrs. Lauga
• The Supreme Court and the fixated persons unit at the QPS did not find that Mr Khalesirad is a risk to Ms Lauga.
• Mr. Khalesirad was let into Parliament by security over two hours before Mr. Pyne knew he was in the house.
“No politicians like scrutiny and we often would prefer our critics go away. However we sign up to the job knowing the criticism that we are exposing ourselves too. There is a clear agenda here to turn the focus away from Ms. Lauga and place it on Mr Khalesirad, to make Mr Khalesirad the issue. My innocent involvement allowed the ALP to get two for the price of one in making their opponents ‘the news’”.
The ALP do not want to discuss Ms Lauga’s issues with Hutchinsons builders or her failure to provide proper disclosure pursuant to section 15(4) Integrity Services Act (correspondence from the Qld Integrity Commissioner attached). Lauga claims her affairs regarding the overrun of her matrimonial home were all cleared and disclosed to the Parliament.
This was nothing more than a political stunt by the ALP. They focus on petty political game playing, in a bid to remove the spotlight from their face. Ask yourself, “If you were in fear of your life from a stalker and discovered that he was in the building would you ring the police or security OR write a letter to the speaker and contact the media. The pen may be mightier than the sword but I’d prefer the police if the situation was so dire. The only conclusion one can make is that this was all an ALP political set up.
It is no surprise the Premier is set to call an election any day, as Mr Khalesirad’s legal team will cross examine Ms. Lauga’s evidence when the trial resumes on December 14. That is something the ALP will be keen to avoid!
* Mr Khalesirad is a former Young Queenslander of the Year.
The Truth Too Late
In December the court threw out the unlawful stalking charges against political blogger Petros Khalesirad. Rockhampton Magistrate Cameron Press said the weight of evidence was not strong enough to prove a stalking charge and said Mr Khalesirad had no case to answer. “I cannot conclude that a reasonable jury even taking the evidence at its highest could find that the charge was proved beyond reasonable doubt,” he said. In court, Mr Khalesirad’s lawyers argued the charges were concocted to pressure him into dropping an investigation of fraud allegations against Ms Lauga’s husband. “Democracy’s an important thing in Australia under a representative government,” Mr Khalesirad said outside court. “I think we have a right to ask questions about government decisions, indeed policy decisions, about members of parliament. I think it’s everyone’s obligation to do that.” Much of the court hearings over the past two days have centred around an incident involving Ms Lauga’s husband which Mr Khalesirad was investigating.